MARATTO

article · QJM

Dynamic Locked Plating Using Near-Cortical Over-Drilling versus Standard Locked Plating for Fixation of Lower Femur Fractures

2024Open accessAin Shams University

Abstract

Abstract Background Fracture Healing in distal femoral fractures is greatly influenced by fixation method. Classic compression plate requires creation of a rigid plate/bone construct which involves soft-tissue stripping and devitalization of the underlying bone, this may lead to inhibited callus formation. Hence, the concept of “Dynamic” Locked Plates has been proposed to decrease construct stiffness and improve callus formation. Aim of the Work To compare functional and radiological outcomes in lower femur fractures treated by dynamic locked plating (using near cortical over drilling) to that treated by standard locked plating. Patients and Methods Prospective study was conducted starting from May 2020 to January 2023 including 30 patients aged from 18 to 65 years old with distal femur fracture treated by dynamic locked plating with near cortex over drilling (15 patients) or standard locked plating (15 patients). We excluded patients with open fractures, periprosthetic fractures, floating knee injuries and poly-traumatized patients. The follow up period was 1 year. Results The current study demonstrated no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding time of union, knee range of motion, nonunion rate, or other specific complications. However, the DLP group was noted to have statistically significant higher callus scores at six weeks postoperative (p value = 0.015) indicating increased callus formation. Conclusion Dynamic locked plating seems to result in improved callus formation and bone healing without sacrificing fixation strength compared with traditional locked plating when used for fractures of the distal femur.

Research topics

  • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.696

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.