MARATTO

article · Technology in Society

Drivers of generative AI adoption in higher education through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour

2024255 citationsOpen accessFayoum University

In plain language

This study investigated the factors influencing the adoption of generative AI (GenAI) tools in higher education, using the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). It examined how perceived benefits, strengths, weaknesses, and risks of GenAI relate to TPB factors such as attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control. The research also explored the link between TPB variables, intention to use GenAI, and actual usage. A quantitative approach was employed, collecting data from 130 lecturers and 168 students across various higher education institutions via an online questionnaire. The findings indicate that while lecturers' and students' perceptions of GenAI risks and weaknesses differ, the perceived strengths and advantages positively influence their attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control. Crucially, the core TPB variables significantly impact the intention to use GenAI, which in turn positively affects its actual adoption.

Key takeaways

  • The study used the Theory of Planned Behaviour to examine generative AI adoption in higher education.
  • Perceived strengths and advantages of generative AI positively influence attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control among lecturers and students.
  • Core Theory of Planned Behaviour variables significantly impact the intention to use generative AI tools.
  • The intention to use generative AI tools positively affects their actual adoption by lecturers and students.
  • Lecturers and students hold differing perceptions regarding the risks and weaknesses of generative AI tools.

Why it matters

This research helps understand why educators and students adopt generative AI. It provides insights for institutions to develop effective policies and guidelines, ensuring the responsible and beneficial integration of these tools into learning and teaching environments. Understanding these drivers is crucial for optimising educational technology strategies.

Commercialisation angle

The findings offer managerial and policy implications for stakeholders in higher education, guiding the formulation of rules and regulations for GenAI use. This research could inform educational technology developers on features that enhance perceived strengths and address weaknesses, potentially leading to more widely adopted and ethically sound AI tools for learning and teaching. It is applied research, providing insights for strategic planning and product development in the educational technology sector.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Drawing on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), this study investigates the relationship between the perceived benefits, strengths, weaknesses, and risks of generative AI (GenAI) tools and the fundamental factors of the TPB model (i.e., attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control). The study also investigates the structural association between the TPB variables and intention to use GenAI tools, and how the latter might affect the actual usage of GenAI tools in higher education. The paper adopts a quantitative approach, relying on an anonymous self-administered online questionnaire to gather primary data from 130 lecturers and 168 students in higher education institutions (HEIs) in several countries, and PLS-SEM for data analysis. The results indicate that although lecturers' and students' perceptions of the risks and weaknesses of GenAI tools differ, the perceived strengths and advantages of GenAI technologies have a significant and positive impact on their attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control. The TPB core variables positively and significantly impact lecturers' and students’ intentions to use GenAI tools, which in turn significantly and positively impact their adoption of such tools. This paper advances theory by outlining the factors shaping the adoption of GenAI technologies in HEIs. It provides stakeholders with a variety of managerial and policy implications for how to formulate suitable rules and regulations to utilise the advantages of these tools while mitigating the impacts of their disadvantages. Limitations and future research opportunities are also outlined.

Research topics

  • Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • AI and HR Technologies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102521

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.