article · Assiut Scientific Nursing Journal
Background: Ureteral double J stents are commonly used tools in urology for the management of various urological conditions. However, it is not devoid of morbidity. Aim: To assess the effect of neglected ureteral double J stent on the patients' quality of life and conducting a comparative study. Research design: Comparative research design was utilized to conduct this study. Setting: Urology operation at Assiut University Urology and Nephrology Hospital. Sample: A convenience sample of "70" patients were undergoing ureteral double J stent removal, their ages from "18 - 65" years. Patient divided into 2 group: non-neglected group (less than 120 days) included 40 patients and neglected group (more than 120 days) included 30 patients. Tools: Tool (I) Patient assessment sheet, Tool (II) Ureteral stent related symptoms and Tool (III) King’s health questionnaire . Results: Median age of patients was (39.50) years. Hematuria, urinary tract infection, and stone formation were encountered in 56.7%, 50%, and 63.3% of neglected patients, versus 27.5%, 20%, and 2.5% of non-neglected patients, respectively. Neglected patients have a lower overall quality of life than non-neglected patients. Conclusion: Negligence of ureteral double J stent, accompanied by acute side effects, affected and reduced the patient's quality of life. Recommendations: Educational booklet should be available to all patients with ureteral double J stent.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21608/asnj.2024.306464.1865
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.