MARATTO

article · International Journal of Financial Studies

Do Stable Banks Disclose More Climate Risk? Governance Evidence from the MENA Region

Abstract

The current study aims to identify the factors influencing the disclosure of climate-related risk information by the MENA banking sector and how bank financial stability acts as a moderator. The study draws from agency theory, resource dependency theory, and organizational legitimacy theory. Textual analysis is used to analyze a panel data set comprising 46 banks of 13 MENA countries for the years 2020 to 2024 (230 observations). We investigate the impact of board independence, board size, and gender diversity on climate risk disclosure. It is found that while board size and gender diversity have a positive effect on CRD, there is no direct effect of board independence on CRD. However, after taking bank financial stability (Z-score) into account as a moderating variable, it is revealed that there is a significantly positive relationship between board independence and bank financial stability. Therefore, it can be said that independent board members are helpful in CRD only when banks have sound financial stability. This study provides various robustness tests through subsample analysis and alternative methods of estimating model parameters.

Research topics

  • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/ijfs14070171

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.