article · Annals of Vascular Surgery

Do Collaterals Matter? Comparing The Clinical Outcomes of Direct (DR), Indirect-with-collateral (IR-tc), and Indirect-without-collateral (IR-wc) in Endovascular Revascularization of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia (CLTI) Patients.

Mohamed Shahat
Ahmed Reyad
Magdy Hagag
Noureldin Ahmed Mohamed
Maher Abdalmoneim
Mustafa Abdelmonem

2026Assiut University

In plain language

No abstract is available for this record, so no summary has been generated.

Research topics

Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Renal and Vascular Pathologies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

View on publisher site Record on OpenAlex

DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2026.03.050

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.

New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.