article · International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science
Legislative bodies worldwide are increasingly integrating digital technologies to enhance efficiency, transparency, and public engagement. In developing democracies such as Nigeria, however, the adoption of e‑legislature systems remains limited. This paper proceeds from the argument that analog lawmaking can be made substantially more efficient through the strategic application of technology to core legislative functions such as bill drafting, voting, and committee management. This paper examines the integration of digital technologies into the legislative processes of Nigeria's National Assembly. It identifies the barriers to e‑legislature adoption and analyses how these obstacles intersect with the constitutional and democratic functions of the legislature. Employing a qualitative case study design, the research triangulates primary legal instruments including the 1999 Constitution, the Standing Orders, and the Evidence Act with a thematic analysis of secondary literature, institutional reports, and comparative insights from e‑parliament initiatives across Africa. The study reveals that while digital tools offer the potential to improve bill drafting, voting efficiency, and citizen access, the Nigerian legislature confronts profound obstacles. These include an outdated legal framework that does not fully recognize electronic legislative acts, inadequate digital infrastructure, limited technical capacity among legislative staff, and an institutional culture that privileges informal, paper‑based traditions. The analysis further identifies a recurring tension between the speed of digital processes and the deliberative, consensus‑oriented character of lawmaking. Across legal, institutional, and infrastructural dimensions, the barriers tend to reinforce one another, sustaining a pattern of fragmented automation rather than systemic transformation.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.51583/ijltemas.2026.150400091
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.