MARATTO

article · Buildings

Digital Twin-Stakeholder Informed Best Practice Framework for Building Management: A Case of a University Library

Abstract

Digital twin, a technology that offers an opportunity to access dynamic and real-time data for efficient decision-making, has witnessed minimal utilization in smart facilities management. Additionally, combining stakeholders’ views with a digital twin provides more efficient building management. Thus, this study aimed to combine digital twin technology and stakeholders’ views to develop a best practice framework for enhancing indoor conditions of a typical university building. It analyses feedback received from building stakeholders and results from a digital twin to develop the best practice framework. This study adopted a case study approach by using a university library at Western Sydney University, Australia. It used a multi-stage approach and a series of interviews with facility management experts for the development and validation of the framework, respectively. The key findings revealed that all the monitored parameters in the digital twin system were within acceptable thresholds. However, the building occupants expressed concerns regarding excessive solar heat gain, inadequate airflow, and direct glare. It was also revealed that heat was the most disturbing environmental parameter in the library, and built-in energy efficiency measures were also not adequately maintained, contributing to the building’s energy consumption. The proposed framework provides strategic measures for improving building occupants’ comfort and energy consumption. Furthermore, the best practice framework aids facility managers in holistically considering key aspects of building services management in managing such buildings.

Research topics

  • Digital Transformation in Industry
  • BIM and Construction Integration
  • Building Energy and Comfort Optimization

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/buildings16050924

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.