Digital Reputation Risk Disclosure and Firm Value: Novel Evidence Using Textual Analysis of Saudi Non-Financial Listed Companies

Abstract

Current accounting standards do not allow recognition of intangible assets for indigenously created properties, resulting in a discrepancy between the book value and market value of firms operating within digital economies, where investments like cybersecurity and data governance are grossed up immediately on the statement of financial position as they are considered to be expensed under IFRS. This paper investigates whether voluntary Digital Reputation Risk Disclosure (DRRD) rectifies this valuation gap for the non-financial firms listed on the Saudi Exchange. Based on an automated bilingual dictionary-based textual analysis of 891 corporate documents and a two-step System GMM estimator run on an unbalanced panel of 619 firm-year observations from a sample of 132 firms for the period 2020–2024, we show that DRRD is statistically significantly negatively related to firm value at conventional levels, implying that investors perceive such disclosures as indications of higher risk exposure rather than stronger governance capabilities. While statistically insignificant, the moderating effect of firm size shows that negative valuation effects are concentrated on large firms according to sub-sample analysis. These findings are confirmed across several alternative specifications in the robustness checks. The findings demonstrate that voluntary digital risk disclosure, in the absence of standards-based frameworks, is not effective at bridging this valuation gap, and may instead activate functional fixation among investors. These findings highlight the importance of IASB’s standardization agenda regarding intangible assets and present relevant empirical data for developing capital markets.