MARATTO

article · Zagazig University Medical Journal

Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Dobutamine Echocardiography and Electrocardiography in Patients with Suspected Chronic Coronary Syndrome

2024Open accessZagazig University

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of chronic coronary syndrome is challenging. The role of exercise electrocardiography (ECG) decreased because of many artifacts and low diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, non-invasive stress imaging is the current approved recommendation for diagnosis of chronic coronary syndrome in patients with clinical pre-test probability of more than 15% or 5-15% with high clinical likelihood. Dobutamine echocardiography (Echo) is widely available but with limitations. Therefore, combined dobutamine Echo and ECG could improve the diagnostic accuracy.Methods: We performed a cross sectional study in Zagazig university hospitals in the period between April 2023 and October 2023. We included all patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome with clinical pre-test probability more than 5%. All patients underwent combined dobutamine Echo and ECG and invasive coronary angiography. Diagnostic accuracy of combined dobutamine Echo and ECG was compared with dobutamine Echo. Results: Among 50 patients suspected chronic coronary syndrome, 37 patients had significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in invasive coronary angiography. As compared with dobutamine Echo, combined Echo and ECG had more favorable sensitivity (97.1% vs 93.5%) and specificity (75% vs 57.9%) for prediction of significant CAD. Conclusions: With better diagnostic accuracy, combined dobutamine Echo and ECG is simple, cheap, and available non-invasive test for diagnosis of chronic coronary syndrome.

Research topics

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2024.258846.3074

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.