MARATTO

article · Scientific Reports

Development and characterization of ivermectin nanoformulations for topical acaricidal activity against Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks

Abstract

Abstract Ticks are among the most significant ectoparasites of livestock and humans, posing serious health and economic risks. The growing resistance to conventional acaricides highlights the need for safer and more effective alternatives. This study aimed to evaluate the acaricidal efficacy of different ivermectin (IVM) nanoformulations against different developmental stages of Rhipicephalus sanguineus tick. Different ivermectin nanoformulations were fabricated and evaluated for their physicochemical properties. An in vitro study was performed using larval, nymphal, and adult immersion tests, followed by an in vivo trial against unfed adults using the most effective formulation. All nanoformulations showed particle sizes from 450 to 650 nm and a polydispersity index range from 0.34 to 0.65. IVM spanlastics exhibited the smallest particle size, highest encapsulation efficiency (92%), and a sustained release profile. Based on LC 50 values, IVM spanlastics showed superior acaricidal activity against larvae (LC 50 : 0.05%), nymphs (LC 50 : 0.09%), and unfed adults (LC 50 :0.16%); followed by IVM-SeNPs, where the LC 50 values were 0.10, 0.23, and 0.38% for larvae, nymphs, and unfed adults, respectively. The in vivo study of IVM spanlastics demonstrated 100% mortality of adult ticks within four days after application. IVM spanlastics could be topically applied as an alternative to conventional injectable IVM to control R. sanguineus ticks. Further toxicological studies are necessary to ensure the safety of these formulations for environmental and veterinary use.

Research topics

  • Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Helminth infection and control
  • Dermatological diseases and infestations

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-56357-0

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.