MARATTO

article · Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research

Developing a cyclist typology: A mixed-methods study at the University of Lagos campus

2026Open accessUniversity of Lagos

Abstract

This research explores the benefits and challenges of cycling, focusing on university campuses in developing countries. Conducted at the University of Lagos (UNILAG) in Nigeria, the study uses a mixed-methods approach, including ethnographic observations, quantitative counts, street-intercept interviews, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis. The data revealed distinct cyclist groups based on their behaviours and motivations, leading to the development of the Campus Cycling Engagement Matrix. This framework categorises students and staff into Active, Potential, Aspiring, and Non-Cyclists, enabling the prediction of cycling behaviour. It provides context-specific interventions for each group to guide UNILAG to develop a cycling policy. Our matrix will also be helpful to other African universities. The findings show that the campus cycling infrastructure needs improvements such as separated bicycle paths, covered parking stations, and connectivity with the rest of Lagos city. This study contributes to urban mobility literature by offering a nuanced understanding of campus cycling in a developing country context and providing practical insights for policy development. Developed the Campus Cycling Engagement Matrix for interventions in UNILAG. Mixed-methods approach: ethnography, interviews, counts, and document analysis. Identified distinct cyclist groups based on behaviours and motivations. Highlights the critical role of supportive cycling infrastructure. Recommendations for urban planners to enhance cycling infrastructure.

Research topics

  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Urban Green Space and Health

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmr.2026.100112

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.