MARATTO

article · Helwan International Journal of Nursing Research and Practice

Determinants of primigravida preference Regarding Mode of Delivery

2024Open accessHelwan University

Abstract

The rate of cesarean section (CS) has considerably increased in both developed and developing countries, despite it being recommended for medical indications. Aim: To assess the determinants of primigravida preference regarding mode of delivery. Design: Descriptive design was used in this study. Setting: The study was conducted at antenatal care clinic affiliated to Beni-sueif University Hospital, Egypt. Sample: Purposive sample of 100 primigravid women.Tools: two tools were used; Tool (I): Structured interviewing questionnaire, Tool (II): Determinants of delivery mode questionnaire. Result: Around 50% of primigravida, in the age range of 20 to 25 years, expressed their preferences for the mode of delivery. Among these women, more than two-thirds preferred cesarean section (CS), while nearly one-third preferred vaginal delivery (VD). The majority of primigravida who did not prefer VD cited reasons such as fear of experiencing severe pain during childbirth, anxiety about the possibility of vaginal opening expansion or tearing, and fear of undergoing an episiotomy. Almost primigravida who chose CS mentioned reasons such as not wanting to wait for the onset of labor pain,usage of analgesics during CS, and the perception that CS is less painful. Conclusion: Primigravida overwhelmingly preferred (CS) as their mode of delivery. Several determinants had a positive impact on their preference for CS over (VD), the desire to avoid the intense pain with labor, fear of episiotomy, anxiety about vaginal tearing; influenced primigravida's preference for CS over VD. Recommendations: Development of educational programs to increase the primigravida awareness, knowledge and practices regarding both mode of delivery.

Research topics

  • Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/hijnrp.2024.291476.1167

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.