MARATTO

article · Journal of Molecular Structure

Design, synthesis and evaluation of the 2′-hydroxy-3′-iodo-5′-nitrochalcones for cytotoxicity (MCF-7 & A549) and potential to inhibit tyrosine kinase (VEGFR-2) activity

202421 citationsOpen accessUniversity of South Africa

Abstract

A series of the 2-hydroxy-3-iodo-5-nitrochalcones 3a–n was synthesized and characterized spectroscopically (FT-IR, ESI-MS, 1H-NMR, and 13C-NMR) complemented with single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The compounds were, in turn, subjected to an in vitro cytotoxicity study against the human lung (A549) and breast (MCF-7) cancer cell lines as well as the human embryonic kidney (HEK293-T) cell line using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. The test compounds exhibited moderate cytotoxicity against the A549 cell line compared to staurosporine (IC50 = 0.22 ± 0.02 µM) and nitendanib (IC50 = 0.46 ± 0.06 µM) with IC50 values in the range 13.36 ± 0.29–52.16 ± 2.40 µM. Moderate cytotoxicity was also observed for the test compounds against the MCF-7 cell line compared to staurosporine (IC50 = 0.25 ± 0.02 µM) and nitendanib (IC50 = 0.44 ± 0.03 µM) with IC50 values in the range 11.98 ± 0.09–30.66 ± 1.15 µM. The potential of the test compounds to inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) tyrosine kinase activity was evaluated through enzymatic assay in vitro. Compounds 3f, 3i and 3k exhibited strong activity against this enzyme compared to the reference drugs, staurosporine (IC50 =5.18 ± 0.003 µM) and nintendanib (IC50 = 6.87 ± 0.002 µM), with IC50 values of 3.59 ± 0.02 µM, 3.76 ± 0.01 µM and 5.36 ± 0.02 µM, respectively. The results of VEGFR-2 inhibition correlated well with that of the cytotoxicity assay. The modelled structures show that the binding of the test compounds into the VEGFR-2 active site was driven mostly by hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions.

Research topics

  • Synthesis and biological activity
  • Quinazolinone synthesis and applications
  • Synthesis of Organic Compounds

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.137785

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.