MARATTO

article · Annual Research & Review in Biology

Design, Synthesis and Antibacterial Evaluation of (Z)-3-Methyl-2-Oxo-N-(2-((1-phenylethylidene) amino)ethyl)-1,2-Dihydroquinoxaline-6-Sulfonamide Derivatives

2026Open accessEkiti State University

Abstract

Background: Multidrug-resistant bacteria continue to create a need for new antibacterial scaffolds, and quinoxaline-sulfonamide derivatives are of interest because of their reported biological activity. Aim: This study synthesised and characterised a series of (Z)-3-methyl-2-oxo-N-(2-((1-phenylethylidene)amino)ethyl)-1,2-dihydroquinoxaline-6-sulfonamide derivatives and evaluated their antibacterial activity against selected bacterial strains. Methods: The target derivatives were prepared by condensation of N-(2-aminoethyl)-3-methyl-2-oxo-1,2-dihydroquinoxaline-6-sulfonamide with substituted aromatic ketones. The products were obtained in moderate to high yields. The synthesised compounds were characterised using FT-IR, ¹H-NMR and ¹³C-NMR spectroscopy. Antibacterial activity was assessed by agar-well diffusion, followed by determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). Results: All synthesised compounds showed activity against the 10 bacterial strains evaluated. The reported MIC values ranged from 0.0781 to 0.625 mg/mL. The study also reported bactericidal activity based on the MBC assessment, with activity varying among the compounds and test organisms. The findings indicate that structural variation within the synthesised series influenced antibacterial performance under the assay conditions. Conclusion: The synthesised quinoxaline-sulfonamide Schiff bases demonstrated antibacterial activity against the selected Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains. These results support further investigation of this compound series as a basis for developing and optimising antibacterial candidates.

Research topics

  • Synthesis and Biological Evaluation
  • Synthesis and biological activity
  • Synthesis and Characterization of Pyrroles

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.9734/arrb/2026/v41i92444

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.