MARATTO

article · Current Analytical Chemistry

Design of Solid-contact Ion-selective Electrode with Multiwall-carbonNanotubes for Assay of Sulfacetamide in Rabbit Aqueous Humour

Abstract

Background: Inclusion of multiwall-carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) as ion-to-electron transducers within the ionophore-doped PVC membrane has a great impact on the stability and robustness of the produced sensor performance compared to conventional liquid-based ISEs. Objective: Solid-contact ion selective electrodes (SC-ISEs) were fabricated and optimized for the assay of sulfacetamide sodium in both ophthalmic eye drops and in rabbit aqueous humor. Methods: 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (2HP-β-CD) was selected as an ionophore to dope the ionselective membrane to enhance its selectivity towards sulfacetamide. The performance of multiwall-CNTs as ion-to-electron transducer was evaluated by comparing MWCNT-based SC-ISE with control sensor which does not include the MWCNTs. The electrochemical performance characteristics of the proposed sensors were assessed in accordance with the IUPAC recommendations. A green profile assessment of the proposed method was performed using Eco-Scale and AGREES metrics. Results: Inclusion of MWCNT into the sensing membrane improved the performance of the developed sensor. The linearity range was (2.5 x 10-4 M - 1.0 x 10-2 M) for both sensors and the LOD was estimated to be 5.6 x 10-5 M for GCE/ISM(CNT) and 1.5x 10-4 M for control sensor GCE/ISM. The results of green assessment for both the developed and the official method showed an excellent greenness of the proposed method. Conclusion: The proposed sensor can be applied successfully for the determination of sulfacetamide in eye drops and rabbit aqueous humour.

Research topics

  • Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.2174/1573411019666230213105056

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.