article
This paper introduces a compact rectangular patch antenna design featuring a partial ground plane on a low-cost FR4-epoxy substrate, suitable for wireless communication systems. Simulations confirm excellent single-element performance at 5.9 GHz, achieving a reflection coefficient (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$S_{11}$</tex>) below <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$-57 d B$</tex>, a peak gain of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$5 d B i$</tex>, and efficiency exceeding 90%. Following a systematic optimization process, a 4-port MIMO configuration based on this element was developed. This multi-antenna system demonstrates strong performance, resonating at 5.9 GHz with a wide 4 GHz bandwidth (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$4.5-8.5 \text{GHz}$</tex> for <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$S_{11}<-10 d B$</tex>) and excellent inter-port isolation exceeding <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$25 d B$</tex>. The design maintains high gain and radiation efficiency (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$>90 {\%}$</tex>). Analysis of standard MIMO metrics (ECC, TARC, MEG, CCL) confirmed acceptable performance. In summary, the optimized 4-port design successfully reduces mutual coupling by <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$25 d B$</tex> while preserving high gain, efficiency, and bandwidth.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1109/imc-ssgp67001.2025.11474111
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.