MARATTO

preprint

Design and Optimization of Novel EGFR Inhibitors for NSCLC: A Computational Approach to Overcome Resistance Mechanisms

Abstract

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most prevalent form of lung cancer, often associated with poor prognosis and resistance to treatment. The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) remains a crucial target in therapy. Methods: An advanced computational workflow was used to identify and optimize EGFR inhibitors, integrating active site prediction (CB-Dock2), ligand generation (Lead3), virtual screening (AutoDock Vina), ADMET analysis (ADMETlab 2.0), and QSAR modeling. The QSAR model was validated to ensure predictive reliability. Results: Compound g18_mol18 demonstrated a binding affinity of -9.9 kcal/mol, significantly stronger than the standard compound (-7.381 kcal/mol) (p = 0.039). Interaction analysis showed that g18_mol18 formed multiple hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic contacts with key residues. Despite its strong binding affinity, ADMET analysis highlighted challenges such as poor intestinal absorption (HIA: 0.005) and potential hepatotoxicity. However, its low hERG inhibition (0.302 vs. 0.923) indicates a lower risk of cardiotoxicity, suggesting a favorable cardiac safety profile. Conclusion: The study identifies g18_mol18 as a potent EGFR inhibitor with significantly higher binding affinity and more extensive interactions than current treatments. Although it presents pharmacokinetic challenges, these findings underline its potential as a more effective and safer alternative for NSCLC treatment, warranting further experimental validation and optimization for clinical applications. Such developments could lead to durable therapeutic responses, addressing key resistance issues seen with current EGFR inhibitors.

Research topics

  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-hr04s

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.