MARATTO

article · Perspectives in Clinical Research

Description of the development and preliminary validation of antiretroviral therapy adverse event detection trigger tool for adult human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients

Abstract

Abstract Background: The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Global Trigger Tool detects generic patient harm yet is not tailored to antiretroviral therapy (ART)-associated adverse drug events (ADEs) in adults living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome – a critical pharmacovigilance gap in care. Aim: The study is aimed at developing and preliminarily validating an HIV-specific trigger tool for ADE surveillance. Materials and Methods: Candidate triggers were compiled from literature, expert consultation, and patient interviews, then refined through a four-round modified Delphi survey of clinicians and pharmacovigilance specialists. Inter-rater reliability (κ) and content validity indices (CVIs) were calculated. The finalized tool was pilot-tested by retrospective review of 60 randomly selected ART patient records. Results: Consensus produced 52 triggers, organized into two domains (specific and nonspecific) and 13 specific subcategories. The expert agreement was substantial (κ =0.67). The scale-level CVI averaged 0.95. Pilot application detected 96 trigger occurrences, yielding 60 confirmed ADEs (positive predictive value = 62.5%). Switch or substitution of ART (22%) was the most common trigger, while acute kidney injury accounted for 17% of ADEs. Conclusion: The newly developed trigger tool demonstrates strong content validity and practical utility for identifying ART-related ADEs in adult HIV populations. Comparative studies against conventional detection methods are required to establish sensitivity and broader applicability across diverse healthcare settings.

Research topics

  • Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_280_25

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.