MARATTO

article · Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC)

Deployment of STATCOM with Fuzzy Logic Control for Improving the Performance of Power System under Different Faults Conditions

20244 citationsOpen accessMinia University

Abstract

This paper purposes to demonstrate the effectiveness of fuzzy logic controller (FLC) over proportional integral (PI) controller for reducing the fault current and maintaining the voltage profile at different faults conditions using Static Synchronous Compensator (STATCOM) which is considered an effective FACTS (Flexible Alternating Current Transmission System) device. The study evaluates the performance of a power system equipped with STATCOM which is connected in shunt with bus B1 under various faults conditions, including single-phase and three-phase faults. The performance of the STATCOM is evaluated by using two different controllers: PI controllers and FLCs. A comparative analysis is done between the performances of the two different controllers using Matlab/Simulink software package. The results obtained conclude that the presented system gives better performance with STATCOM as compared to not using it under several faults conditions besides, the STATCOM gives better response with FLC as compared to PI controller. It is demonstrated that STATCOM with FLC can reduce the positive sequence fault current at bus B1 ‎to 96.49% of its value without ‎using STATCOM under line to ground fault and 98.17% under three line to ‎ground fault whereas STATCOM with PI controller can reduce it ‎to (99.57, 99.05%), respectively. Also, the bus voltage B1 is improved to 102.19% by using STATCOM with fuzzy controller under line to ground fault and 101.86% under three line to ‎ground fault whereas STATCOM with PI controller can improve it ‎to (100.21, 100.93%), respectively.

Research topics

  • Power System Optimization and Stability

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.18196/jrc.v5i3.21558

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.