book chapter · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series
This study evaluates the effectiveness of various machine learning strategies in managing energy in Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs), focusing on fuel cell and battery inverter behaviour. The analysis compares four methods Gaussian Naive Bayes (NB), Random Forest, k-NN, and AdaBoost using key metrics: Recall, f1-score, and precision. Gaussian NB and Random Forest achieve identical performance for the fuel cell (Recall: 0.87, f1-score: 0.82, precision: 0.89) and battery (Recall: 0.66, f1-score: 0.57, precision: 0.5). In contrast, k-NN achieves a precision of 0.74, while AdaBoost excels with a fuel cell precision of 0.98 and a battery precision of 0.94. AdaBoost also outperforms the other methods in f1-score (0.98 for the fuel cell, 0.90 for the battery) and recall (0.95 for the fuel cell, 0.84 for the battery), highlighting its superior performance in inverter behaviour control.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3373-1220-0.ch003
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.