article · Journal of Computational Biophysics and Chemistry
Cytochalasans are a structurally diverse class of fungal-derived natural products with remarkable cytotoxic and anticancer properties. However, the rarity of experimental data and the complexity of their molecular scaffolds hinder systematic pharmacological evaluation. In this study, we introduce a deep learning-based artificial neural network (ANN) framework to predict the cytotoxic activity of cytochalasans using an experimental dataset of 291 compounds. Molecular descriptors, including physicochemical properties (SwissADME, pkCSM) and structural fingerprints (RDKit, Morgan, and pharmacophore-based), were extracted and processed via dimensionality reduction (PCA, retaining 95% variance). A six-layer ANN architecture was trained and evaluated across training (70%), testing (15%), and validation (15%) sets, achieving robust predictive performance (training: accuracy = 0.97, AUC = 0.998; test: accuracy = 0.84, AUC = 0.883; validation: accuracy = 0.90, AUC = 0.893). This ANN model enables classification of compounds into active or inactive categories, further subclassifying actives based on predicted potency (strong, moderate, or weak). The effective virtual screening of 127 previously untested cytochalasan derivatives using the trained ANN illustrates the model’s practical applicability. The compounds prioritized by the ANN during virtual screening. High-confidence predictions were further validated through molecular docking studies, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations against 15-lipoxygenase-2 (15-LOX-2). Furthermore, three derivatives were prioritized based on strong predicted activity by the deep learning model: cytochalasin Z6 (11), chaetoglobosin W (64), and hydroxy-10-phenyl-[11]-cytochalasa-13, 19-diene-1,21-dione (102). These cytochalasans emerged as the most promising candidates for cancer treatment due to their capacity to inhibit the 15-LOX-2 enzyme, as demonstrated by molecular docking and MD analyses.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1142/s273741652650078x
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.