MARATTO

preprint · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Deblending the MIGHTEE-COSMOS survey with XID+: the resolved radio source counts to <i>S</i> 1.4 ≈ 5μJy

Abstract

ABSTRACT Deep radio continuum surveys provide fundamental constraints on galaxy evolution, but source confusion limits sensitivity to the faintest sources. We present a complete framework for producing high-fidelity deblended radio catalogues from the confused MIGHTEE maps using the probabilistic deblending framework XID+ and prior positions from deep multi-wavelength data in the COSMOS field. To assess performance, we construct MIGHTEE-like simulations based on the Tiered Radio Extragalactic Continuum Simulation radio source population, ensuring a realistic distribution of star-forming galaxies and active galactic nuclei for validation. Through these simulations, we show that prior catalogue purity is the dominant factor controlling deblending accuracy: a high-purity prior, containing only sources with a high likelihood of radio detection, recovers accurate flux densities and reproduces input source counts down to $\sim 3\sigma$ (where $\sigma =$ thermal noise). On the other hand, a complete prior overestimates the source counts due to spurious detections. Our optimal strategy combines the high-purity prior with a mask that removes sources detected above $50 \mu$Jy. Applied to the $\sim$1.3 deg$^2$ area of the MIGHTEE-COSMOS field defined by overlapping multi-wavelength data, this procedure yields a deblended catalogue of 89 562 sources. The derived 1.4 GHz source counts agree with independent P(D) analyses and indicate that we resolve the radio background to $\sim 4.8\, \mu$Jy. We also define a recommended high-fidelity sample of 20 757 sources, based on detection significance, flux density, and goodness-of-fit, which provides reliable flux densities for individual sources in the confusion-limited regime.

Research topics

  • Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
  • Astronomy and Astrophysical Research

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stag285

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.