article
This study explores the performance characteristics of six distinct DC-DC boost converter configurations, each optimized to achieve a voltage gain of 2. The configurations analyzed include Series/Parallel, 3-clock Fibonacci, Ladder <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(C=10 \mu\mathrm{F})$</tex>, Doubler <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(C=10 \mu\mathrm{F})$</tex>, Ladder <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(C =500 \mu\mathrm{F})$</tex>, and Doubler <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(C=500 \mu\mathrm{F})$</tex>. Each configuration is evaluated based on parameters such as efficiency, optimum resistive load range, settling time, and output DC ripple. The findings indicate that the Series/Parallel configuration offers the highest efficiency at 94.53%, while the Ladder configuration using <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$500 \mu\mathrm{F}$</tex> capacitance achieves a notable efficiency of 97.24% despite a longer settling time. These results underscore the trade-offs inherent in designing DC-DC converters for a range of applications, highlighting the need for careful consideration of performance metrics based on specific operational requirements.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1109/icm66518.2025.11322456
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.