MARATTO

article · International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science

Data Privacy and Utility Trade-Off: An Efficient K-Anonymization Algorithm with Low Information Loss

Abstract

Privacy Preserving Data Publishing (PPDP) remains a critical challenge in the era of large-scale data sharing, where the need to balance data utility and individual privacy is inherently conflicting. Among existing models, k-anonymity continues to be widely adopted due to its simplicity and interpretability; however, traditional k-anonymization algorithms suffer from key limitations, including distribution-agnostic partitioning and inadequate handling of outliers, which lead to excessive information loss and reduced data utility. This paper proposes RAYDEN, a novel hybrid k-anonymization algorithm that integrates distribution-aware VP-tree partitioning with Connectivity-based Outlier Factor (COF) detection to address these limitations. The algorithm employs Gower distance to support mixed-type datasets and introduces a statistically adaptive threshold for robust outlier identification. Unlike existing approaches, RAYDEN incorporates a recursive outlier recovery mechanism that re-partitions detected outliers, maximizing data retention before applying suppression as a last resort. Experimental evaluation on the UCI Adult dataset demonstrates that RAYDEN consistently outperforms compared algorithms across key utility metrics utilized in the study. The outlier recovery mechanism achieves a mean recovery rate exceeding 90% across all k values, substantially reducing suppression-related information loss compared to Mondrian with COF. While incurring higher computational cost, the algorithm achieves practical execution times and significantly improves the privacy–utility trade-off, particularly at commonly used k values. These results establish RAYDEN as a robust and effective framework for privacy-preserving data publishing in mixed-type datasets.

Research topics

  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Cryptography and Data Security

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.51583/ijltemas.2026.150400063

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.