article · Cambridge Prisms Global Mental Health
Abstract This study aimed to perform a cross-country validation of the Arabic version of the World Health Organization 5-item (WHO-5) Well-Being Index, in terms of factor structure, composite reliability, cross-gender measurement invariance and concurrent validity. We carried out a cross-sectional, web-based study on a total of 3,247 young adults (aged 18–35 years) from six Arab countries (Tunisia, Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Kuwait). Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the one-factor model demonstrated acceptable fit across all six countries. In addition, the Arabic WHO-5 Well-Being Index yielded high reliability coefficients in samples from each country (McDonald’s ω and Cronbach’s α = .92–.96), across genders ( ω = .95 in men and .94 in women) and age groups ( ω = .94/α = .94 in participants aged ≤25 years and ω =.96/ α =.96 in those aged ≥26 years). Multi-group analyses demonstrated that configural, metric and scalar invariance were supported across gender, countries and age groups. Regarding concurrent validity, WHO-5 Well-being scores were strongly and significantly inversely correlated with depression, anxiety, stress, suicidal ideation and insomnia severity. This study provides a brief, valid and reliable Arabic version of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index that can be applied cross-nationally among Arabic-speaking young adult populations for screening and research purposes.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10051
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.