MARATTO

preprint

CRISPR-CAS9 MEDIATED EDITING OF THE <i>LACZ</i> GENE FOR OPTIMIZING LIPASE PRODUCTION AND CHARACTERIZATION IN ENGINEERED <i>ESCHERICHIA COLI</i> USING POTATO PEEL AS A GLUCOSE SOURCE

20242 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Lagos

Abstract

ABSTRACT Improper disposal of potato peels harms the environment, wasting nutrient-rich resources that could be used for beneficial enzyme production like lipase. This study aimed to edit the lacZ gene in Escherichia coli using utilizing the CRISPR Cas9 technology. Both edited and unedited E. coli were used for submerged fermentation of potato peels to produce and characterize lipase. The lacZ gene was edited using the CRISPR Cas9 technology, and the efficiency was measured using multiplex PCR and gel electrophoresis. To measure lipolytic activity, olive oil screening was performed. The temperature and pH of the lipase were used to characterize it after partial purification and submerged fermentation at 10°C, 30°C, and 45°C. Blue colonies indicated the lacZ gene was unedited, lacZ gene editing and repair was demonstrated by white colonies, and no colonies demonstrated the editing but not repair of the lacZ gene. Bands at 1,100 bp indicated unedited lacZ gene , while 650 bp showed edited lacZ gene . Increased cell mass was observed at 10°C. CRISPR Cas9 edited E. coli showed a clearer zone than the unedited in the lipase medium. The highest lipase activity from both edited and unedited E. coli was at 35°C, and the lowest at 65°C. Optimal pH was 7, with lowest activity at pH 4. The CRISPR Cas9 edited E. coli demonstrated significantly higher enzyme activities (p&lt;0.05). This study concluded that CRISPR Cas9-mediated lacZ gene editing in E. coli enhances its ability to utilize potato peels, increasing lipase production.

Research topics

  • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.02.608350

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.