MARATTO

article · Clinical Drug Investigation

Cost Effectiveness of First-Line Therapies for Treatment-Naïve Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia in South Africa

Abstract

In the South African public healthcare setting, CIT regimens (FCR and BR) represent cost-effective first-line treatment strategies for symptomatic, treatment-naïve CLL. Bendamustine-plus-rituximab emerged as the most decision-robust option under uncertainty, while FCR yielded the lowest point-estimate ICER. Among CIT regimens, FCR may be preferred in fit patients, while BR represents a more decision-robust option in older or unfit populations. Targeted therapies such as ibrutinib and VenO, despite superior clinical efficacy, are not cost effective at current prices. Substantial price reductions, generic entry, or targeted use in high-risk subgroups may improve their value and enable equitable access within South Africa's resource-constrained health system.

Research topics

  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s40261-026-01538-y

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.