MARATTO

article · PubMed

Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-weekly semaglutide vs. once-daily liraglutide administered subcutaneously in patients with overweight and obesity: a decision analysis.

20243 citationsAin Shams University

Abstract

This cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that employing once-weekly 2.4 mg semaglutide emerges as a remarkably cost-effective option when contrasted with once-daily 3.0 mg liraglutide in patients with overweight and obesity when added to physical activity and diet control.

Research topics

  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202405_36181

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.