article · The European Physical Journal C
Abstract Extended teleparallel gravity, characterized by function F ( Q ), where Q is the non-metricity scalar, is one of the most promising approaches to general relativity. In this paper, we reexamine a specific dynamical dark energy model, which is indistinguishable from the $$\Lambda $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi></mml:math> CDM model at the present time and exhibits a special event in the future, within F ( Q ) gravity. To constrain the free parameters of the model, we perform Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis, using the last data from $$\hbox {Pantheon}^{+}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Pantheon</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math> and the latest measurements of the H(z) parameter, combined. On the basis of this analysis, we find that our dynamical dark energy model, in the context of F(Q) gravity, lies in the quintessence regime rather than in the phantom regime, as in the case of general relativity. Furthermore, this behavior affects the future expansion of the Universe, as it becomes decelerating at a $$1\sigma $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> confidence level for $$z<-0.5$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo><</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> , showing a bounce at $$z_{\text {B}}\approx -0.835$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>B</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.835</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> . We support our conclusion with a cosmographic analysis.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13143-4
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.