article · Pan African Medical Journal
Introduction: neck circumference is one of the anthropometric measurements that are not routinely considered in the evaluation of patients with obesity and other non-communicable diseases (NCDs). This study was aimed at correlating neck circumference with other anthropometric measurements. Methods: it was a cross-sectional, descriptive study that involved the assessment of obesity among 197 participants (104 males and 93 males) using Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, hip circumference, and neck circumference. Results: the male-to-female ratio was 1: 1: 1. The mean age of participants was 41.8±16.3 years. The prevalence of obesity among the participants was 17.8% which comprised (Class 1 obesity at 11.2%, class 2 obesity 5.1%, and morbid obesity at 1.5%). Using the waist-hip ratio (WHR), the prevalence of central obesity was 26.9% among the participants. The mean BMI, Waist circumference, WHR, and Neck circumference were 25.5±5.2, 88.1±14.1, 0.88±0.1, and 36.4±4.7 respectively. The mean neck circumference for males and females was 38.0cm and 34.5cm respectively. The mean neck circumference for males was significantly different from that of females (p< 0.001). The correlation of neck circumference with other measures of obesity was highly significant (p< 0.001) for BMI (r =0.29), waist circumference (r=0.80), hip circumference (r=0.85), and WHR (r= 0.34). The systolic and diastolic blood pressures correlated positively with neck circumference and all other measures of obesity with highly significant p-values. Conclusion: it is necessary to consider the use of neck circumference as a measure of obesity since it correlated significantly with other anthropometric measurements from the study. However, this is a one-centre study which limits the generalization of the findings.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2025.50.71.45777
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.