MARATTO

article · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Correlation of Genetic Polymorphism of CYP3A5 to Cyclophosphamide Efficacy and Toxicity in Rhabdomyosarcoma Pediatric Egyptian Cancer Patients

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) accounts for 50% of soft tissue sarcomas and 7% of pediatric malignancies. Cyclophosphamide (CPA) is the cornerstone of therapy and is a prodrug that is activated by the highly polymorphic drug-metabolizing enzyme CYP3A5. We aim to examine the possible CYP3A5 polymorphism association with CPA efficacy, survival outcomes, and toxicity in Egyptian pediatric RMS patients. METHODS: The three non-functional SNPs, CYP3A5*3 rs776746 (C_26201809_30), CYP3A5*6 rs10264272 (C_30203950_10), and CYP3A5*7 rs41303343 (C_32287188_10) were genotyped by real-time PCR. We conducted a cohort retrospective study of 150 pediatric RMS patients treated with CPA-based first-line treatment to analyze the association between these genotypes and CPA efficacy/toxicities in RMS patients. KEY FINDINGS: The frequency of having normal, intermediate, and poor metabolizers was 4.7%, 34%, and 61.3%, respectively. There was an association between these different phenotypes, genotypes, and CPA efficacy/toxicity. Hemorrhagic cystitis and pancytopenia were present in all patients, while nephrotoxicity incidence was 87.3%. There was a notable difference in the occurrence of hemorrhagic cystitis among CYP3A5 intermediate metabolizers *1/*3, *1/*6, and poor metabolizers *3/*3, *3/*6 with a significance level of p<0.05. Neither CYP3A5*7 polymorphism nor *6/*6 genotype was identified in our study. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that CYP3A5*3 (rs776746) and CYP3A5*6 (rs10264272) have a great association with CPA efficacy and toxicity in RMS patients.

Research topics

  • Chemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2024.25.7.2445

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.