MARATTO

article · International Journal of Science Research and Technology

CORRECTING JOINT HETEROSCEDASTICITY AND AUTOCORRELATION IN PANEL DATA: A ROBUST GMM APPROACH

2026Open accessUniversity of Abuja

Abstract

This study evaluated Robust Shrinkage Generalized Method of Moments (RSGMM), Panel Adaptive Ridge GMM (PARGMM) and Heteroscedasticity-Autocorrelation-Robust Shrinkage GMM (HARSGMM) for panel data models where autocorrection and heteroscedasticity coexist. These estimators were designed to simultaneously address multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation, which commonly undermine the reliability of conventional estimators such as Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS), First Difference (FD), and Between Estimators (BTW). Using Monte Carlo simulations, the performance of all estimators was assessed across three scenarios of increasing violation severity and sample sizes (20, 30, 50, 100 and 500). Performance metrics include bias, variance, mean squared error (MSE), and efficiency. Results revealed that HARSGMM and RSGMM consistently outperformed traditional estimators in terms of lower bias and MSE, particularly in settings with high assumption violations and larger samples. Even under baseline conditions with minimal violations, the proposed estimators maintained superior efficiency. These findings support the adoption of HARSGMM and RSGMM as more reliable alternatives for empirical researchers dealing with complex panel datasets where autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity are present. The study concluded with recommendations for broader application and integration of these robust techniques into econometric software and policy-oriented research.

Research topics

  • Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Efficiency Analysis Using DEA

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.70382/tijsrat.v10i9.083

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.