MARATTO

review · Journal of Perioperative Practice

Conventional anatomical landmark versus preprocedural ultrasound for thoracic epidural analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

In plain language

The abstract on record is too brief for a reliable plain-language summary, so none has been generated.

Abstract

Thoracic epidural insertion is improved by ultrasound but not the success rate. Quality research with larger samples is needed to emphasise these conclusions.

Research topics

  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1177/17504589231181974

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.