MARATTO

review · Journal of Hazardous Materials

Contaminant containment for sustainable remediation of persistent contaminants in soil and groundwater

2023151 citationsOpen accessKafr el-Sheikh University

In plain language

Extensive subsurface contamination often makes the complete removal or disposal of hazardous pollutants impractical. In such settings, contaminant containment measures provide an alternative by preventing or minimising the offsite movement of persistent contaminants in soil and groundwater. These approaches encompass physical, chemical, and biological methods, including permeable and impermeable barriers, stabilisation and solidification, and phytostabilisation. Containment offers distinct operational advantages because it halts the migration of contaminant plumes and allows pollutants to be addressed in place without requiring costly and disruptive soil excavation. Nonetheless, these systems are not entirely maintenance-free solutions. They demand ongoing, routine inspections to monitor potential mobilised pollutants and verify that containment remains secure over time. Examining physical, chemical, and biological processes alongside real and simulated field trials demonstrates that containment is a dependable, risk-reducing strategy for managing inaccessible or persistent environmental contamination.

Key takeaways

  • Contaminant containment prevents the offsite migration of soil and groundwater pollutants without requiring the excavation of contaminated materials.
  • Available containment approaches include physical, chemical, and biological techniques such as barrier installations, stabilisation, solidification, and phytostabilisation.
  • Containment is particularly valuable for managing contaminated sites where pollutant sources are physically inaccessible or cannot be safely removed.
  • Regular monitoring and inspections are essential long-term requirements to detect and prevent contaminant mobilisation and migration.

Why it matters

Persistent soil and groundwater contamination threatens ecosystems and public health, but digging up vast amounts of polluted earth is often impossible. Containment strategies offer a practical, lower-impact way to halt the spread of toxic plumes and manage risks where source removal is unfeasible. Understanding these methods helps site managers and regulators protect surrounding communities and water resources effectively.

Commercialisation angle

The findings inform environmental engineering firms, remediation contractors, and public land managers dealing with persistent subsurface pollution. Because the technologies, including barrier systems, stabilisation, and phytostabilisation, have case studies operating under real or simulated field conditions, they represent applied and field-ready remediation approaches. Commercial value centres on the deployment of these containment systems alongside the recurring inspection, sensing, and monitoring services required to track contaminant plumes over extended periods.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Contaminant containment measures are often necessary to prevent or minimize offsite movement of contaminated materials for disposal or other purposes when they can be buried or left in place due to extensive subsurface contamination. These measures can include physical, chemical, and biological technologies such as impermeable and permeable barriers, stabilization and solidification, and phytostabilization. Contaminant containment is advantageous because it can stop contaminant plumes from migrating further and allow for pollutant reduction at sites where the source is inaccessible or cannot be removed. Moreover, unlike other options, contaminant containment measures do not require the excavation of contaminated substrates. However, contaminant containment measures require regular inspections to monitor for contaminant mobilization and migration. This review critically evaluates the sources of persistent contaminants, the different approaches to contaminant remediation, and the various physical-chemical-biological processes of contaminant containment. Additionally, the review provides case studies of contaminant containment operations under real or simulated field conditions. In summary, contaminant containment measures are essential for preventing further contamination and reducing risks to public health and the environment. While periodic monitoring is necessary, the benefits of contaminant containment make it a valuable remediation option when other methods are not feasible.

Research topics

  • Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131575

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.