MARATTO

article · Heliyon

Comprehensive evaluation and prediction of groundwater quality and risk indices using quantitative approaches, multivariate analysis, and machine learning models: An exploratory study

202463 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Sadat City

In plain language

Groundwater quality assessment across 48 wells in the El-Menoufia region combined chemical indexing, health risk evaluations, geographic information systems, and recurrent neural networks. Although overall drinking water quality index scores classified most samples as good for consumption, specific areas revealed significant contamination. In particular, concentrations of lead, manganese, and iron exceeded standard thresholds, with the central zone showing the highest levels of metal pollution. Health risk analyses showed non-carcinogenic dangers for children through both oral intake and dermal contact, while adults faced risks solely through ingestion. Recurrent neural network models successfully forecasted key contamination and quality metrics using selected input parameters, demonstrating high predictive accuracy across testing datasets. This approach demonstrates how combining standard geochemical evaluations with predictive machine learning models can improve monitoring of vulnerable drinking water resources.

Key takeaways

  • Most examined groundwater wells in the El-Menoufia region met drinking standards, but localised areas exhibited substantial heavy metal pollution.
  • Lead and manganese concentrations frequently exceeded acceptable drinking water thresholds, with iron also acting as a primary pollutant.
  • Health risk assessments revealed non-carcinogenic exposure risks for children via ingestion and skin contact, whereas adults were vulnerable only through ingestion.
  • Recurrent neural network models accurately predicted drinking water and heavy metal pollution indices, achieving high test set correlation values.

Why it matters

Groundwater contamination from heavy metals poses severe health threats, particularly to developing children. Demonstrating that machine learning models can accurately forecast water quality indices from a limited set of parameters allows environmental managers to identify high-risk locations more quickly. This integrated assessment method helps direct remediation efforts and targeted testing to regions where hazardous elements such as lead and manganese threaten community health.

Commercialisation angle

The research demonstrates an applied predictive framework that could assist water resource authorities, municipal planners, and environmental consultancies in automated water monitoring. By using neural networks to predict complex water quality indices from fewer chemical inputs, the tool could lower operational testing costs. The technology currently sits at an applied and tested research stage, having been validated on regional field data, but requires software product development before reaching commercial deployment.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2> Assessing and predicting quality of groundwater is crucial in managing groundwater availability effectively. In the current study, groundwater quality was thoroughly appraised using various indexing methods, including the drinking water quality index (DWQI), pollution index of heavy metals (HPI), pollution index (PI), metal index (MI), degree of contamination (C<sub>d</sub>), and risk indicators, like hazard quotient (HQ) and total hazard indicator (HI). The assessments were augmented through multivariate analytical techniques, models based on recurrent neural networks (RNNs), and integration of geographic information system (GIS) technology. The analysis measured physicochemical parameters across 48 groundwater wells from El-Menoufia region, revealing distinct water types influenced by ion exchange, rock-water interactions, and silicate weathering. Notably, the groundwater showed elevated levels of certain metals, particularly manganese (Mn) and lead (Pb), exceeding the drinking water limits. The DWQI deemed the bulk of the tested samples suitable for consumption, assigning them to the "good" category, whereas a small number were considered inferior quality. The HPI, MI, and C<sub>d</sub> indices indicated significant pollution in the central study region. The PI revealed that Pb, Mn, and Fe were significant contributors to water pollution, falling between classes IV (strongly affected) and V (seriously affected). HQ and HI analyses identified the central area of the study as particularly prone to metal contamination, signifying a high risk to children via oral and dermal routes and to adults through oral exposure alone (non-carcinogenic risk). The adults had no health risks due to dermal contact. Finally, the RNN simulation model effectively predicted the health and water quality indices in training and testing series. For instance, the RNN model excelled in predicting the DWQI, with three key parameters being crucial. The model demonstrated an excellent fit on the training set, achieving an R<sup>2</sup> of 1.00 with a very low root mean of squared error (RMSE) of 0.01. However, on the testing set, the model's performance slightly decreased, showing an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.96 and an RMSE of 2.73. Regarding HPI, the RNN model performed exceptionally well as the primary predictor, with R<sup>2</sup> values of 1.00 (RMSE = 0.01) and 0.93 (RMSE = 27.35) for the training and testing sets, respectively. This study provides a unique perspective for improving the integration of various techniques to gain a more comprehensive understanding of groundwater quality and its associated health risks, with a strong focus on feature selection strategies to enhance model accuracy and interpretability.

Research topics

  • Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
  • Hydrological Forecasting Using AI

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36606

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.