article · Continence
Complications can result from the use of mesh to treat female stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. While some of these complications are also common to non-mesh-based procedures, the risk of vaginal exposure of mesh, or mesh extrusion into other pelvic organs are unique complications that must be considered when using mesh. Chronic pain after mesh-based procedures can be a difficult complication to manage and may occur. Patients with stress incontinence or prolapse that are considering surgical treatment should be counselled on the potential complications and their likelihood of them occurring. Although there has been focus on the development, introduction and regulation of mesh, the diagnostic clinical decision-making process has not been put under scrutiny, and likely significantly impacts patient outcomes. There is a need to develop patient reported outcome measures for mesh procedures, and further work is needed to create a standardised way to measure and communicate different types of mesh-related complications. Future research will need to focus on the diagnostic clinical decision making process is recommended, including education on the ‘whole journey’ of the patient during the perioperative pathway.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2024.101713
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.