MARATTO

article · Zagazig University Medical Journal

Comparison of Multiple-U and Simple Interrupted Suture Techniques in Microvascular Anastomosis: An Experimental Study in Male Albino Rats

2024Open accessZagazig University

Abstract

Background: The multiple-U technique is a new method for microvascular anastomosis that allows for easy and stable intima to intima contact, which is crucial for a successful procedure. The present work aimed to compare between the multiple u technique and simple interrupted suture technique regarding the patency, time needed for anastomosis, duration of bleeding after declamping and blood leakage.Methods: In an experimental study, forty adult male albino rats with average weight 200-350 gm were subjected to femoral artery anastomosis, were split into two equal groups (n=20): Simple Interrupted Suture in one group and Multiple-U technique in another group. The milking test was done for assessment of the patency of the repaired vessel after anastomosis. Assessment of anastomosis time, anastomotic leakage, bleeding time and vessel diameter were done.Results: Regarding the anastomotic leakage, the Multiple –U technique leakage’s (6 -18 ml ) was less than leakage of the Simple Interrupted suture technique (7.5 - 24 ml). Regarding vessel diameter after anastomosis there was a significant decrease of Vessel Diameter in Simple interrupted suture technique (1.7 – 1.9 mm) when compared with Multiple U-technique (1.9 – 2.17 mm) (p= 0.017). Regarding Patency rate and anastomosis time, our results showed non-significant differences between the two techniques.Conclusion: Multiple-U technique led to significant decrease in bleeding time and vessel diameter after anastomosis therefore our recommendation is to use Multiple-U technique particularly in digital replantation and in cases who have high risk for vessel occlusion.

Research topics

  • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
  • History of Medical Practice

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2024.316290.3543

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.