article · International Journal of Religion
Despite the challenges posed by the ongoing pandemic, there is a growing consensus that classroom assessment remains a more advantageous option for students than distance evaluation. The pandemic has catalysed developing robust information infrastructure and training qualified personnel to ensure educational continuity and assessment reliability. However, a recent comparative study on ENS maths students revealed no significant difference. This article examines the distance and face-to-face evaluations, presenting data from a comparative study during the pandemic.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.61707/0n1yqp12
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.