MARATTO

article · Notulae Scientia Biologicae

Comparative study of the phytochemical profile, antioxidant, and cytotoxicity activities of different co-product extracts of Cannabis sativa L. leaves

2025Open accessIbn Tofail University

Abstract

Cannabis sativa L. is one of the most extensively studied medicinal plants due to its wide array of bioactive metabolites with therapeutic and industrial applications. In this study, leaf co-products were valorized by assessing their phytochemical composition, antioxidant potential, and cytotoxic activity using three extraction techniques: decoction, sonication, and maceration. The decoction method produced the highest extraction yield, while sonication resulted in extracts with the greatest concentrations of total phenolics (43.2 mg GAE/g) and flavonoids (24.09 mg QE/g). Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis revealed distinct chemical signatures for each extract, confirming the strong influence of the extraction process on metabolite recovery. Antioxidant evaluation showed that the sonication extract exhibited the most pronounced free radical scavenging effect (DPPH assay, IC₅₀ = 36.95 µg/mL), whereas the maceration extract exhibited the highest reducing power in the FRAP assay (97%). Cytotoxicity assays conducted on Vero (normal kidney) and HT-29 (human colorectal cancer) cell lines demonstrated inhibitory effects for all extracts, with the sonication extract showing the strongest activity against HT-29 cells. A significant association of the sonication extract between its antioxidant potential and cytotoxic properties was observed. Overall, these findings highlight Cannabis sativa leaf co-products as promising sources of bioactive compounds with potential applications in both pharmaceutical and nutraceutical development.

Research topics

  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies
  • Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.55779/nsb17412572

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.