MARATTO

article · Green Technologies and Sustainability

Comparative study of functional activities and microorganism’s communities in agro-ecological and conventional soil of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) crops

Abstract

Land management practices are widely known to influence soil quality. In this ecosystem, soil microorganisms participate in soil biogeochemical cycles; in particular, the transformation of organic matter is essential for plant nutrition. This study aimed to assess differences in the functional diversity and structure of soil microbial communities between two tomato plant cultures in Morocco: one with conventional management and the other with agroecological practices. The soil functional diversity was assessed by evaluating the microbial metabolic capabilities using the Biolog EcoPlate™ microplate method and measuring soil enzyme activities. The microbial biomass of bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi was evaluated by medium-based cultures. The analysis demonstrated that the soil microbial community reacts differently depending on the mode of management. Results showed that the organic farming soil exhibited significantly higher metabolic activity and diversity, as indicated by the average well color development (AWCD) value of 0.79 compared to 0.61 in the conventional soil. Similarly, the soil activities of β-D-galactosidase, phosphatase, and urease were markedly greater in the organic soil. Moreover, the microbial populations of bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi were more abundant in the organic soil. These findings demonstrate the positive impact of organic farming practices on sustaining long-term soil productivity and health, supporting their role in enhancing sustainability and productivity in agroecosystems.

Research topics

  • Plant Growth Enhancement Techniques
  • Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
  • Agriculture and Biological Studies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.grets.2026.100418

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.