MARATTO

article · Computational and Theoretical Chemistry

Comparative study of CO adsorption on Au, Cu, MoO2 and MoS2 2D Nanoparticles

20242 citationsOpen accessUniversity of the Witwatersrand

Abstract

This study focuses on a comparative analysis of the electronic properties of triangular, irregular hexagonal, and octagonal 2D nanoparticles containing 10, 12, and 14 motifs, made of Au, Cu, MoO 2 , and MoS 2 . The investigation was carried out using density functional theory. The formation energies and vibrational frequencies demonstrate that the 2D nanostructure configurations can exist as stable structures. Edge atoms with lower coordination numbers than central atoms, are the preferred sites for CO adsorption. Using orbital-weighting dual descriptors calculated from Fukui functions enabled the identification of a majority nucleophilic attack sites in Au and Cu nanoparticles, while MoO 2 and MoS 2 -based nanoparticles present almost as many electrophilic sites as nucleophilic sites. The charge transferred between the nanostructures and the CO molecule and the redistribution of the projected density of states were used to assess the strength of interfacial bonds and the nature of the fundamental interaction involved in the bonding. • Triangular, hexagonal, and octagonal 2D nanoparticles can exist as stable as stable structures. • Edges atoms exhibit lower coordination and are the preferred sites for CO adsorption. • Orbital-weighting dual descriptors indicate a majority nucleophilic attack sites in Au and Cu nanoparticles. • MoO 2 and MoS 2 -based nanoparticles present almost as many electrophilic sites as nucleophilic sites.

Research topics

  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
  • ZnO doping and properties

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2024.114877

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.