MARATTO

article · The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY AND DOPPLER ULTRASOUND IN REDUCTION MAMMOPLASTY

2024Open accessMansoura University

Abstract

Background: Breast hypertrophy is a challenging condition as it is associated with increased body burden and chest oppression. The most devastating complication of breast reduction which is post-operative necrosis of the nipple-areola complex (NAC). Aim: This prospective case series study was to investigate the vascular supply to the NAC and to compare between Doppler ultrasound and computed tomography angiography for surgical planning of breast pedicle in reduction mammoplasty. Methods: The study was conducted on a total of 17 cases scheduled for reduction mammaplasty in the plastic surgery department at Mansoura University. Preoperative CT angiography, Doppler ultrasound, and intraoperative Doppler ultrasound were used to conduct our study. Radiologists and plastic surgeons work together to conduct a presurgical plan according to the 3D scan and accompanying measurement parameters. Consequent follow-up happened immediately after surgery, up to 6 months, assessing necrosis rates and adverse events of the NAC.Results: Based on CTA, in right side, we could detect most dominant Inferior perforators in 58.8% , Superiomedial perforator in 41.2 % , Superior perforator in 11.8% . In left side, Inferior perforators in 41.2%, Superiomedial perforator in 35.3%, Superior perforator in 17.6%. Based on Doppler ultrasound, in right breast we could detect most audible inferior equal to superiomedial perforators in 41.2% It does not necessitate that the most audible perforator by doppler or the most dominant one by CTA to be selected to survive NAC. Conclusions: Doppler ultrasound is a valuable method to help in pedicle selection in reduction mammoplasty which has matching results with CT angiography in 75%% of examined right breasts and 87.5% in left ones.

Research topics

  • Breast Implant and Reconstruction
  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/ejprs.2024.317031.1374

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.