MARATTO

article · Processes

Comparative Characterization of Pumpkin Seed Protein Isolates Obtained by Alkaline, Ultrasound-Assisted, and Microwave-Assisted Extraction: Functionality, Particle Size, and Structural Integrity

2026Open accessMohammed V University

Abstract

As demand for sustainable plant protein rises, pumpkin seeds emerge as a promising but underutilized source. Conventional alkaline extraction (ALK) often impairs protein functionality, prompting interest in non-thermal alternatives. This study systematically compared the functional, colloidal, and structural properties of pumpkin seed protein isolates obtained via ALK (conducted at 50 °C), ultrasound-assisted (UAE), and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). UAE produced the highest extraction yield (50.07%), superior overall solubility, greatest water and fat absorption capacities, and lowest least gelation concentration (12%). Furthermore, UAE best preserved native protein secondary structure (retaining 43.45% alpha-helix), as quantified by FTIR peak deconvolution, and maintained an intact, flake-like morphology under scanning electron microscopy (SEM), yielding the most uniform particle size distribution. Conversely, MAE achieved the highest protein content (73.53%) and the most negative zeta potential, leading to the highest emulsifying and foaming capacities despite inducing a bimodal particle size and irregular, porous surface morphology. ALK performed the poorest across structural and functional metrics, severely denaturing the proteins due to combined alkaline and thermal stress. UAE is recommended for applications requiring optimal solubility and gelation, whereas MAE is highly effective for emulsion- and foam-based food systems, reinforcing pumpkin seeds as a viable sustainable protein ingredient.

Research topics

  • Proteins in Food Systems
  • Food composition and properties
  • Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/pr14081250

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.