MARATTO

preprint

Comparative Assessment of Sugarcane Bagasse and Sawdust Ashes as Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Lime-Based Binders  

2026Open accessUniversity of Eldoret

Abstract

<title>Abstract</title> The high energy demand, rising cost, and environmental impact of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) production have intensified the search for low-carbon alternatives, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Lime–pozzolana binders incorporating agricultural waste ashes are promising, yet their development is often guided by strength-based evaluation alone, limiting mechanistic understanding. This study presents a systematic comparison of sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA)–lime and sawdust ash (SDA)–lime binders by linking early-age pozzolanic reactivity with material characteristics and mortar performance. SCBA and SDA were produced under controlled calcination (600–700°C) and characterized for chemical composition, mineralogy, particle size, and surface area. Pozzolanic activity was quantified using an electrical conductivity method, and its relationship with bulk density, water absorption, and 28-day compressive strength was evaluated and benchmarked against OPC mortars. SCBA exhibited a high combined SiO₂ + Al₂O₃ + Fe₂O₃ content (86.6%) and predominantly amorphous structure, while SDA showed lower oxide content (23.16%) but higher surface area, resulting in faster early-age reactivity. Despite this, SCBA–lime mortars achieved higher 28-day compressive strengths, although both systems met requirements for low-rise masonry. By directly correlating pozzolanic reactivity with ash composition and mechanical performance, this study advances understanding of structure–property relationships in lime–pozzolana binders and provides performance-informed guidance for selecting locally available agricultural ashes as sustainable alternatives to OPC.

Research topics

  • Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
  • Hygrothermal properties of building materials

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8534952/v1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.