MARATTO

article · Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods

Comparative analysis of shelf life and quality attributes of basil (<i>Ocimum basilicum</i>) cultivated using nutrient film technique (NFT) and substrate-based hydroponic systems

2026Open accessBenha University

Abstract

This study presents, for the first time, a comprehensive comparison between two hydroponic cultivation systems Nutrient Film Technique (NFT) and substrate-based culture regarding the postharvest quality and shelf life of Ocimum basilicum (sweet basil) stored for 21 days at 5 ± 1 °C. Physical (weight loss, color, firmness), -chemical (essential oils, total phenolics, antioxidant activity, chlorophyll content), and microbial (total plate counts, yeast, and mold) attributes were systematically evaluated. NFT-grown basil exhibited superior physical stability, with significantly lower weight loss (7.5 % vs. 11.2 %) and higher firmness at Day 21 (p < 0.05). In contrast, substrate-grown basil accumulated higher levels of essential oils and total phenolics (by 21 % and 18 %, respectively), reflecting enhanced secondary metabolism. Microbial results showed that NFT basil maintained total plate counts below 5.1 log CFU g–1, whereas substrate basil reached 6.2 log CFU g–1, exceeding the international safety threshold (106 CFU g–1; ISO 4833-1:2013; FDA, 2023). Overall, the comparative assessment established clear relationships among physical, chemical, and microbial quality indices, confirming that NFT basil retained acceptable sensory and microbial quality for up to 21 days. These findings highlight system-dependent trade-offs between postharvest stability and phytochemical enrichment, offering new insights for optimizing hydroponic basil production to meet targeted quality and market requirements.

Research topics

  • Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
  • Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
  • Plant Disease Management Techniques

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.15586/qas.v18i2.1617

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.