MARATTO

article · Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Comparative Analysis of Leadless Versus Transvenous Pacemakers in Non‐Heart Failure Patients: A Multicenter US Retrospective Study

In plain language

The abstract on record is too brief for a reliable plain-language summary, so none has been generated.

Abstract

In the absence of HF, LPM was associated with fewer rates of mechanical complications and CRHI. However, late mortality was higher with LPMs. Randomized trials comparing the two devices are crucial.

Research topics

  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1111/jce.16672

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.