MARATTO

article · Journal of Applied Microbiology

Comparative analysis of diarrheagenic and uropathogenic <i>Escherichia coli</i> isolates: antimicrobial resistance, virulence, and genomic profiling

Abstract

AIMS: Escherichia coli is a key pathogen causing gastrointestinal and urinary tract infections. Diarrheagenic E. coli (DEC) and uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) are distinct major pathotypes linked to specific clinical outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to compare DEC and UPEC isolates regarding distribution, antimicrobial resistance, serotypes, resistance, and virulence gene profiles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 400 clinical samples (200 stools and 200 urine) were analyzed using phenotypic and genotypic methods. Antimicrobial resistance, serotyping, and detection of resistance and virulence genes were performed. Phylogenetic and correlation analyses were conducted to explore genetic relationships and interactions. RESULTS: Of 97 E. coli isolates (24.25% prevalence), 56 DEC and 41 UPEC were detected. DEC isolates primarily included serotypes O26, O45, and O55, while UPEC predominantly featured O1 and O25. UPEC showed higher multidrug resistance, while DEC was more virulent. UPEC carried unique markers (ureC, papC), and DEC harbored stx and aggR genes associated with gastrointestinal infections. Phylogenetic analysis showed separate clustering for DEC and UPEC, with limited genetic overlap. Correlation analysis identified strong associations within resistance and virulence genes but a negative correlation between these traits. CONCLUSION: This study compared the phenotypic and genetic features of DEC and UPEC, highlighting their distinct pathogenic traits. Limited genetic overlap suggests potential gene transfer, influencing adaptability, and evolution.

Research topics

  • Escherichia coli research studies
  • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Vibrio bacteria research studies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1093/jambio/lxaf082

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.