MARATTO

article · Journal of Science Innovation and Technology Research

Combustion Performance and Emission Characteristics of Sawdust-Coal Pellets Using Waste Styrofoam as Binder

2026Open accessDelta State University

Abstract

Managing municipal solid waste remains a major environmental challenge, particularly due to persistent non-biodegradable materials, such as expanded polystyrene (Styrofoam), and underutilised biomass, such as sawdust. While Styrofoam contributes to environmental pollution, sawdust offers significant but largely untapped energy potential. This study investigates the role of Styrofoam in sawdust–coal pellets as an energy-dense binder that causes a dilution or concentration effect depending on the baseline biomass-coal mixing matrix, aiming to enhance fuel quality while assessing associated emission trade-offs. Six pellet formulations were developed, including sawdust–coal blends (10:90 and 20:80) and pure coal controls, prepared with and without a 30 wt% Styrofoam binder. Pellets were fabricated using a manual screw press, sun-dried, and characterised via bomb calorimetry, proximate analysis, and X-ray fluorescence. Stoichiometric combustion modelling and Python-based simulations were applied to estimate flue gas compositions. Results indicate that the addition of Styrofoam increased the calorific value by 8.3–20.2% (up to 22.72 MJ/kg), reduced the moisture content to 0.95%, and increased the carbon and volatile matter contents. Although sulphur content rose slightly (0.67–1.11%), SO₂ emissions remained low and within acceptable limits. Overall, Styrofoam-enhanced pellets demonstrated improved energy performance with manageable emissions, supporting their potential for sustainable waste-to-energy applications.

Research topics

  • Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Coal Properties and Utilization
  • Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.70382/ajsitr.v12i9.072

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.