MARATTO

article · BMC Ophthalmology

Combined phacogoniosynechialysis with viscocanalostomy and Ologen implant for the management of primary angle-closure glaucoma: a retrospective cohort pilot study

2026Open accessSuez University

Abstract

Medical treatment is ineffective in controlling the intraocular pressure (IOP) in primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) with extensive peripheral anterior synechia (PAS), and surgery should be considered. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of phacogoniosynechialysis (Phaco-GSL) with viscocanalostomy and Ologen implant for the management of medically uncontrolled PACG with PAS ≥ 270°. This retrospective cohort study included 27 eyes from 27 patients with PACG who had one eye with medically uncontrolled PACG with or without cataract. These eyes had ≥ 270° of PAS, the IOP was above 21 mmHg with maximum topical antiglaucoma treatment or less than 21 mmHg with glaucoma medication intolerance. All eyes were treated with Phaco-GSL combined with viscocanalostomy and an Ologen implant. The follow-up period was one year. One year postoperatively, complete success was achieved in 19 cases (70.4%), qualified success in 6 cases (22.2%), and failure in 2 cases (7.4%). The mean decrease in IOP was 13.33 ± 4.07 mmHg, the mean reduction of antiglaucoma medications was 2.74 ± 1.10, and the mean percentage of reduction in IOP was 48.11 ± 9.85%. There was a statistically significant decrease in IOP and antiglaucoma medications. Malignant glaucoma occurred in three patients. It was treated successfully; other complications were trivial. Goniopuncture was needed after surgery in 18 eyes (66.7%) to control the IOP. Phaco-GSL with viscocanalostomy with Ologen implant is an effective procedure in PACG to reach the target IOP and decrease the number of antiglaucoma medications.

Research topics

  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
  • Corneal surgery and disorders

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s12886-026-04758-0

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.