MARATTO

article · Zagazig University Medical Journal

Clinicopathological Impact of CPA4, UHRF1, Glypican-1, and CD90 Expression in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Epithelioid Malignant Mesothelioma

20242 citationsOpen accessZagazig University

Abstract

background: Accurate diagnosis, early detection, and differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma from mesothelioma; particularly the epithelioid subtype is needed to allow better management thus to improve their prognosis.Aim of our study was to assess applicability of CPA4, UHRF1, glypican-1 and CD90 expression by immunohistochemistry to differentiate between lung adenocarcinoma and epithelioid mesothelioma in addition to detection of their prognostic roles and relation to patients’ survival.Methods: We collected samples from 30 patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma and 30 patients diagnosed with epithelioid mesothelioma. For the immunohistochemistry, sections of all collected samples were incubated with CPA4, UHRF1, glypican-1 and CD90 to assess their diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: A highly significant association was detected between positive CPA4, UHRF1 expression in lung adenocarcinoma and their diagnostic accuracy (p value <0.001). Also, highly significant association was detected between positive CD90, Glypican 1 expression in epithelioid mesothelioma and their diagnostic accuracy (p value <0.001). CPA4 expression was associated with shorter OS rate (P value 0.019, 0.009) UHRF1 expression was associated with shorter OS rate (P value=0.009) Conclusions: CPA4, UHRF1, glypican-1 and CD90 were considered novel biomarkers that have important roles in differentiation between epithelioid malignant mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma of the lung with high sensitivity and specificity.

Research topics

  • Occupational and environmental lung diseases
  • Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
  • Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2024.270576.3175

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.